The LAD did not support the preparatory phase because most participants did not use the actionable feedback despite perceiving it as potentially useful¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Most participants (11) stated they did not use the actionable feedback, while almost all stated it could be (potentially) useful. → de Vreugd 2024
Evidence¶
de Vreugd 2024¶
de Vreugd, L., van Leeuwen, A., Jansen, R., & van der Schaaf, M. (2024). Learning Analytics Dashboard Design and Evaluation to Support Student Self-Regulation of Study Behaviour. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8529
q2 · i? · design · r2
In the Kirkpatrick Level 3 (Behaviour) interview findings, "most participants stated that they did not use the actionable feedback (11)"; the discussion adds that almost all participants stated the actionable feedback could be (potentially) useful.
"A few participants indicated that the actionable feedback could impact study behaviour (2), but most participants stated that they did not use the actionable feedback (11)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Perceived impact of LAD use on study behaviour varied, with most participants reporting no impact — related
- The LAD was mostly perceived to support student appraisal of study behaviour by providing new insights or awareness — related
- Students and tutors rated predetermined LAD constructs similarly in importance but differed in suggesting and ranking new constructs — related
- In most included studies, AI tool use is preceded by a preparatory phase, but its configuration varies between technology-first and content-first approaches
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
thermos-lad-preparatory-phase-not-supported |
title |
The LAD did not support the preparatory phase because most participants did not use the actionable feedback despite perceiving it as potentially useful |
description |
The LAD did not support the preparatory phase because most participants did not use the actionable feedback despite perceiving it as potentially useful |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — de-vreugd-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.