Claims

Language effects on complex-addition accuracy are larger in auditory than visual presentation format

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Language-related accuracy differences between German and French were larger in auditory than visual presentation format. → Van Rinsveld A 2015

Evidence

Van Rinsveld A 2015

Van Rinsveld A, Brunner M, Landerl K, Schiltz C and Ugen S (2015) The relation between language and arithmetic in bilinguals: insights from different stages of language acquisition. Front. Psychol. 6:265. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00265

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Pairwise comparisons decomposing the language × format interaction on complex-addition CRs showed the German advantage was larger in auditory (η² = 0.373) than visual format (η² = 0.134).

"language-related accuracy differences were larger in auditory, F(1, 185) = 109. 919; p < 0. 001; η 2 = 0. 373, than visual presentation format, F(1, 185) = 28. 536; p < 0. 001; η 2 = 0. 134"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id language-effect-larger-auditory-format
title Language effects on complex-addition accuracy are larger in auditory than visual presentation format
description Language effects on complex-addition accuracy are larger in auditory than visual presentation format
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — van-rinsveld-a-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.