Claims

Experimental and quasi-experimental included studies describe improvements in time, precision, movement economy, task quality or perceived competence after laparoscopic simulation exposure

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Included experimental and quasi-experimental studies reported improvements in time, precision, movement economy, task quality or perceived competence after simulation or VR exposure, but heterogeneous tasks, populations and assessments prevent causal generalization. → Vega Ochoa AD 2026

Evidence

Vega Ochoa AD 2026

Vega Ochoa AD, Pinto Bautista HL, Weber Ipuana WJ, González Cuello MÁ, Díaz Pérez A. (2026). Student perceptions of technology-enhanced simulation resources in laparoscopic training: a scoping review and implications for surgical instrumentation. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10009-z

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's narrative synthesis of its included experimental and quasi-experimental studies (e.g., VR training, structured programs, the Colombian VR study reporting improvements in precision, time and safety). The review states performance findings "should not be interpreted as pooled evidence of effectiveness."

"Experimental and quasi-experimental studies described improvements in time, precision, movement economy, task quality or perceived competence after simulation or VR exposure"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.