Claims

Experimental and control groups were statistically equivalent in mathematics self-efficacy perceptions before the intervention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pre-test scores showed no significant difference between the two groups, and variances were homogeneous. → Sare Şengül 2011

Evidence

Sare Şengül 2011

Sare Şengül. (2011). Effects of Concept Cartoons on Mathematics Self-Efficacy of 7th Grade Students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(4), 2305-2313. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/estp

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-group t-test on pre-test scores of both groups: no significant difference, t(92)= -.346, p>.05; Levene's test (F =1.733 p=.191) indicated equal variances, so groups were comparable before application. No effect size is printed.

"Results of the independent group t-test conducted on the mathematics self-efficacy perception scale pre-test scores of the experimental and control groups showed no significant difference at a statistical level of significance of 0.05 in terms of the mathematics self-efficacy perceptions between the two groups [t(92)= -.346, p>.05]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.