Math achievement growth from preschool through second grade is best characterized by a latent basis curve rather than linear, exponential, or quadratic functions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Model fit comparisons indicated changes and between-person differences in math development across eight occasions were best characterized by a latent basis curve. → Sammy F. Ahmed 2022
Evidence¶
Sammy F. Ahmed 2022¶
Sammy F. Ahmed, Janelle J. Montroy, Lori E. Skibbe, Ryan P. Bowles, & Frederick J. Morrison. (2022). The Timing of Executive Function Development is Associated with Growth in Math Achievement from Preschool through Second Grade. Manuscript in-press at Learning and Instruction. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3814-2955
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Latent growth curve model comparison in Results for the 351-child sample, covarying sex, maternal education, and pre-k language. The latent basis model (AIC = 11978.49, CFI = .95) outperformed linear (Δχ2 (6) = 45.74, p < .001) and exponential (Δχ2 (5) = 41.80, p < .001) models; no effect size printed.
"An evaluation of model fit statistics indicated that changes and between-person differences in children’s math development across eight measurement occasions from preschool through second grade were best characterized by a latent basis curve (χ2 (50) = 88.535, p < .001; AIC = 11978.49; aBIC = 11986.97; CFI = .95; TLI = .95), compared to linear"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Behavioral self-regulation development between ages three and seven is best described by an exponential (nonlinear) growth curve — related
- When PSID-CDS data are restricted to ages 6–11, backward digit span growth is best characterized by a quadratic (not cubic) function — related
- Verbal working memory shows non-linear growth from ages 3–19, with the most rapid growth during childhood and a brief accelerated period during early adolescence — related
- Quadratic latent growth fits MAP longitudinal achievement data better than linear growth across ten states — related
- In a prospective longitudinal sample (ECLS-K:2011), numbers reversed performance follows a logarithmic growth pattern, decelerating over ages 6–11 — related
- Average and superior children develop at different levels and grow increasingly dissimilar with age, with superior children showing adolescent mental acceleration about one year earlier — related
- The average child develops more drawing ability before entering school than during the entire eight years of elementary school — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
latent-basis-best-fit-math-growth |
title |
Math achievement growth from preschool through second grade is best characterized by a latent basis curve rather than linear, exponential, or quadratic functions |
description |
Math achievement growth from preschool through second grade is best characterized by a latent basis curve rather than linear, exponential, or quadratic functions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sammy-f-ahmed-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.