Learner-chosen adaptivity in a collaboration script was feasible as guidance design, but impacted regulatory actions only among students with more advanced self-regulation skills¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the Vogel et al. study, letting learners choose between minimal and maximal detail of guidance was a feasible basis for adaptive scripting, but guidance affected regulatory actions only in students beginning the project with more advanced self-regulation skills. → Charles Crook 2022
Evidence¶
Charles Crook 2022¶
Charles Crook. (2022). CSsCL: the performance of collaborative learning. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-022-09364-y
q2 · i? · theoretical · r3
The commentary summarises the Vogel et al. Special Issue study: learners themselves made the script adaptive by selecting minimal or maximal support detail, and the reported moderator was prior self-regulation skill; no effect size is printed.
"In the end, their notion of learner agency is shown to be a feasible basis for designing adaptive guidance in a collaborative script. But here such guidance only impacted regulatory actions among those students who started the project with more advanced self-regulation skills."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Self-Regulation — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- Self-regulation skills are particularly needed when learning with minimally structured or adaptable collaboration scripts in CSCL — a broader claim this one bears on
- In Experiment 1, self-regulation skills significantly predicted socio-discursive MAS only in the adaptable CSCL script condition — related
- In Experiment 2, actual regulation of adaptable heuristic worked examples showed no significant correlation with self-regulation skills or MAS outcomes — related
- In Experiment 2, self-regulation skills significantly positively predicted domain-specific MAS only in the minimal heuristic worked examples condition — related
- A regulation macro script structured collaboration to support socio-cognitive and socio-emotional monitoring among teacher-education students — related
- In Experiment 1, dyads that more often chose maximum CSCL scaffolding had lower post-test socio-discursive MAS — related
- In Experiment 2, the heuristic worked examples condition significantly affected socio-discursive MAS, with maximal worked examples descriptively best and no significant post-hoc differences — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
learner-agency-adaptive-guidance-only-advanced-regulators |
title |
Learner-chosen adaptivity in a collaboration script was feasible as guidance design, but impacted regulatory actions only among students with more advanced self-regulation skills |
description |
Learner-chosen adaptivity in a collaboration script was feasible as guidance design, but impacted regulatory actions only among students with more advanced self-regulation skills |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — charles-crook-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.