Claims

Learners remember the linguistic information targeted in the interactional feedback they receive in naturalistic peer conversation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On tailor-made post-conversation tests, learners remembered the language items on which they had received feedback, with Yoshi and Ishtaque scoring 100% on the common test while Romi scored 66%. → Ranaweera 2015

Evidence

Ranaweera 2015

Mahishi Ranaweera. (2015). Interactional Feedback in Naturalistic Interaction between L2 English Learners. English Language Teaching, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n11p47

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Tailor-made post tests (open-ended, multiple-choice and scalar items) based on the previous week's feedback episodes were given after each meeting. The article reports "the learners do remember the linguistic information targeted in the interactional feedback"; on the common test "Yoshi and Ishaque scored 100%" while "Romi scored 66%".

"The post conversation test scores showed that the learners do remember the linguistic information targeted in the interactional feedback."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.