Claims

Learning method has a significant separate influence on conceptual understanding, accounting for 29.4% of variance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The separate analysis showed F = 24.983 at error level less than 5% and R2 = 0.294 for conceptual understanding. → Dwi Sulisworo 2017

Evidence

Dwi Sulisworo 2017

Dwi Sulisworo, Novitasari Sutadi. (2017). Science Learning Cycle Method to Enhance the Conceptual Understanding and the Learning Independence on Physics Learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 6(1). http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Separate MANOVA analysis of the quasi-experiment's dependent variables. The article reports F = 24.983, error level less than 5%, and R2 = 0.294, noting "70.6% was influenced by other variables, one of them is students’ learning independence variable".

"the learning method has a significant influence on the conceptual understanding which the F value is 24.983 with an error level is less than 5%. Determination coefficient (R 2) is 0.294 indicating that 29.4% of conceptual understanding was influenced by the learning method"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.