Claims

Learning method has a significant separate influence on students' learning independence, accounting for 89.6% of variance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The learning method variable significantly influenced independence learning with F = 519.518 at error level less than 5% and R2 = 0.896. → Dwi Sulisworo 2017

Evidence

Dwi Sulisworo 2017

Dwi Sulisworo, Novitasari Sutadi. (2017). Science Learning Cycle Method to Enhance the Conceptual Understanding and the Learning Independence on Physics Learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 6(1). http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Separate MANOVA analysis for the independence-learning outcome in the same quasi-experiment. The article reports F = 519.518 and R2 = 0.896, stating "89.6% of students’ learning independence was affected by the learning method, while 10.4% is influenced by other variables".

"The learning method variable also has a significant influence on students’ independence learning. It was concluded by the value of F equal to 519.518 on error level less than 5%. The determination coefficient (R 2) is 0.896"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.