Claims

Review of 23 ILS studies since 2004 finds more dimensionality in learning patterns than previously considered

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Vermunt and Donche's review of 23 studies using the Inventory of Learning Styles concludes there is even more dimensionality in learning patterns than previously considered in the ILS literature. → Patricia A. Alexander 2017

Evidence

Patricia A. Alexander 2017

Patricia A. Alexander. (2017). Issues of Constructs, Contexts, and Continuity: Commentary on Learning in Higher Education. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9409-3

q2 · i? · theoretical · r2

The commentary reports that Vermunt and Donche (2017) focused on 23 studies conducted since 2004 using the Inventory of Learning Styles, and judged that "there is even more dimensionality than had been previously considered in the ILS literature." Second-hand report.

"They overview these studies and come to the judgment that there is even more dimensionality than had been previously considered in the ILS literature."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ils-learning-patterns-greater-dimensionality
title Review of 23 ILS studies since 2004 finds more dimensionality in learning patterns than previously considered
description Review of 23 ILS studies since 2004 finds more dimensionality in learning patterns than previously considered
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — patricia-a-alexander-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.