Review of 23 ILS studies since 2004 finds more dimensionality in learning patterns than previously considered¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Vermunt and Donche's review of 23 studies using the Inventory of Learning Styles concludes there is even more dimensionality in learning patterns than previously considered in the ILS literature. → Patricia A. Alexander 2017
Evidence¶
Patricia A. Alexander 2017¶
Patricia A. Alexander. (2017). Issues of Constructs, Contexts, and Continuity: Commentary on Learning in Higher Education. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9409-3
q2 · i? · theoretical · r2
The commentary reports that Vermunt and Donche (2017) focused on 23 studies conducted since 2004 using the Inventory of Learning Styles, and judged that "there is even more dimensionality than had been previously considered in the ILS literature." Second-hand report.
"They overview these studies and come to the judgment that there is even more dimensionality than had been previously considered in the ILS literature."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Zusho concludes SRL, SAL, and engagement perspectives all entail learner adaptation, and that models of student learning mismatch how they are measured
- Fryer argues perceived control and need for competence may bridge differences among models of higher-education learning toward a mega-theory
- Cultural and linguistic background influences measured learning and cognitive styles, and should be considered in style assessment
- The special issue's contributions divide between narrative-review and systematic-review methodologies — related
- Learning patterns are associated with personal factors (personality, motivation, beliefs, prior education, age, gender); their associations with personality are weak to moderate, indicating learning patterns are not stable traits — related
- Studies since 2004 confirm strong interrelations among processing strategies, regulation strategies, conceptions, and motivations of learning patterns — related
- The learning patterns model differs from SRL models by being multi-dimensional, non-normative, and including external regulation and lack of regulation — related
- Learning patterns relate to contextual factors including teaching strategies, perceptions of the learning environment, and discipline — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ils-learning-patterns-greater-dimensionality |
title |
Review of 23 ILS studies since 2004 finds more dimensionality in learning patterns than previously considered |
description |
Review of 23 ILS studies since 2004 finds more dimensionality in learning patterns than previously considered |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — patricia-a-alexander-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.