Pupils taught with the learning technologies reached a higher complex assessment of educational skills than control pupils (63.4% vs 50.4% of maximum)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? After training, the experimental group's complex assessment of educational skills was higher than the control group's (22.83/63.4% vs 18.16/50.4%). → Tatiana V. Sibgatullina and Olga G. Selivanova 2016

Evidence¶

Tatiana V. Sibgatullina and Olga G. Selivanova 2016¶

Tatiana V. Sibgatullina and Olga G. Selivanova. (2016). Organizing Educational Activity of a Pupil on the Basis of Learning Technologies. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(13), 6056-6067. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Control-stage qualimetric assessment of the pedagogical experiment with experimental (167 people) and control (185 people) groups. The final complex assessment was "22.83 from 36 possible, which is 63.4%" in the experimental group versus 18.16 (50.4%) in the control group; no significance test is printed.

"It is ∑ K (n, j) M (n, j) = 22.83 from 36 possible, which is 63.4%. At the same time the final assessment in control group is ∑ K (n, j) M (n, j) = 18.16, that is 50. 4%."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Control-group pupils improved only in self-analysis (by 3%) and self-organizing (by 1%), with no pupil reaching the 3rd or 4th skill level — related
• In the experimental group, 9% of pupils reached the 4th level in self-analysis, self-goal-setting and self-planning, 15% in self-organizing and 5% in self-assessing, while self-correction was the hardest skill to achieve — related
• Teaching with the created didactic set of high-tech educational laboratory equipment produced higher acquisition of the course's basic concepts than traditional teaching in control groups — related
• Posttest critical thinking scores averaged 11.64 in the e-book class versus 9.41 in the control class, with pretest means of 4.42 and 4.31 — related
• High, average and low achievers taught with SMTV each significantly outperformed their DMTV counterparts on the posttest — related
• Normalized gain in mathematical critical thinking was 0.83 in the e-book class versus 0.76 in the conventional-textbook class — related
• The experimental group showed no significant score decline between post-test and four-week retention test, while the control group declined significantly — related
• The experimental group outperformed controls on only one of five budget questions — identifying maximum stock levels from an inflow–outflow graph — with no significant advantage on the others — related
• SimCalc replacement units produced statistically significant pretest-to-posttest gains in conceptual understanding with student-level effect sizes of .63, .50, and .56 in three Texas experiments — related
• University students who created digital stories with generative-AI help rated their own collaborative problem-solving skills higher than traditionally taught students — related