Claims

Students taught with the Learning Together technique achieved significantly higher psychology posttest scores than students taught by lecture-based teaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2014 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 After eight weeks, the experimental group (M = 77.36, SD = 4.52) significantly outscored the control group (M = 67.00, SD = 6.60) on the psychology achievement posttest, with a printed ES of 0.46. → Tran 2014

Evidence

Tran 2014

Tran, V. D. (2014). The Effects of Cooperative Learning on the Academic Achievement and Knowledge Retention. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p131

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pretest-posttest comparison of two intact classes of 55 first-year primary education students taught by the same lecturer for eight weeks. The t-test showed "a significant difference (t (108) = 9.60, p = .000)" with a printed mean difference of 10.36 and ES = 0.46.

"the findings obtained from t-test analysis on the psychology posttest scores showed a significant difference (t (108) = 9.60, p = .000) between the experimental group (M = 77.36, SD = 4.52) and the control group (M = 67.00, SD = 6.60)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.