In a static group comparison, classes taught with the media achieved higher geometry scores than control classes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experiment classes (mean 67.63, 57 students) scored significantly higher than the control classes (mean 63.22, 59 students) on the geometry test. → Nurwijayanti 2019
Evidence¶
Nurwijayanti 2019¶
Nurwijayanti, A., Budiyono, & Fitriana, L. (2019). Combining Google SketchUp and Ispring Suite 8: A breakthrough to develop geometry learning media. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 103-116. https://jme.ejournal.uns.ac.id/index.php/jme
q2 · i? · design · r3
Product-trials effectiveness test using a static group comparison design with four classes from two schools selected by stratified cluster random sampling. After normality and homogeneity tests, the t-test rejected the null hypothesis and the media group had better achievement.
"The average score of experiment class was 67.63 and control class was 63.22."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Geometric Reasoning — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- The Ispring Suite 8 geometry media with Google SketchUp 3D effects was judged valid by media and material experts — related
- Teachers and students judged the geometry media practical in individual and limited-scale trials — related
- Learning physics with the interactive Motion and Vector Analysis software produced higher conceptual understanding than traditional instruction in a quasi-experiment with XI-grade students — related
- Descriptive post-test means show the demonstration group (M = 58.57) scored higher than the control group (M = 48.13) — related
- Students taught with the Learning Together technique achieved significantly higher psychology posttest scores than students taught by lecture-based teaching — related
- Multimedia application is more effective than conventional media for sixth-semester students' listening comprehension, per a t-test comparison — related
- Class IX physical science students taught with the constructivist 7E model achieved significantly higher post-test and gain scores than students taught with traditional methods — related
- Desktop VR showed no significant declarative-knowledge advantage over traditional instruction after unguided exploration (d = 0.24), and a marginal, non-significant one after scaffolded guidance (d = 0.63, p = .06) — related
- Students taught with a structured AI-supported writing workflow rated their own digital critical thinking and AI literacy much higher at posttest than traditionally taught students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.