Most Oakland secondary students receiving LLI fell short of the recommended minimum number of sessions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students experienced different levels of LLI duration and intensity, and most fell short of the recommended minimum number of sessions. → Naihobe Gonzalez 2018
Evidence¶
Naihobe Gonzalez 2018¶
Naihobe Gonzalez, Sophie MacIntyre, Pilar Beccar-Varela. (2018). Leveled Literacy Intervention for Secondary Students: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Oakland Schools. Oakland, CA: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/leveled-literacy-intervention-for-secondary-students-results-from-a-randomized-controlled-trial
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Implementation finding from the Oakland evaluation: students received varying LLI duration and intensity, and "most fell short of the recommended minimum number of sessions". No counts or percentages are printed in the brief.
"Students experienced different levels of Leveled Literacy Intervention (LLI) duration and intensity, and most fell short of the recommended minimum number of sessions."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- LLI had a negative impact on secondary students' mastery of English language arts/literacy standards — related
- LLI had no impact on secondary students' reading comprehension in the Oakland RCT — related
- Students pulled out of other classes to receive LLI were particularly negatively affected — related
- Secondary schools faced implementation challenges producing variation in LLI duration, intensity, and fidelity — a broader claim this one bears on
- A randomized controlled trial of Once found no significant effect on end-of-year DIBELS scores when students received well below the intended dosage — related
- Second-order technology barriers may be most influential on technology-based intervention implementation, and the quantity of barriers reported was associated with the percentage of students meeting target durations of use — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
lli-students-fell-short-recommended-sessions |
title |
Most Oakland secondary students receiving LLI fell short of the recommended minimum number of sessions |
description |
Most Oakland secondary students receiving LLI fell short of the recommended minimum number of sessions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
recheck_by |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — naihobe-gonzalez-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.