Claims

Low contact alone was not associated with adverse student outcomes; the Low Contact/High Comfort profile had the most favorable correlates

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The Low Contact/High Comfort class had the highest academic performance on all academic measures, even compared to the High Contact/High Comfort group on teacher ratings and WJ Reading scores. → Herman and Reinke 2017 q3 i? Low contact alone was not associated with adverse student performance or outcomes, implying teachers base discomfort on something other than actual contact with parents. → Herman and Reinke 2017 (2)

Evidence

Herman and Reinke 2017

Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M. (2017). Improving Teacher Perceptions of Parent Involvement Patterns: Findings From a Group Randomized Trial. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(1), 89-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000169

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Equality tests of means across follow-up classes (Table 2) in the group randomized trial. Across most comparisons the Low Contact/High Comfort profile emerged as having the most positive child and family correlates.

"Additionally, the Low Contact/High Comfort class had the highest academic perfor- mance on all academic measures, even in com- parison to the High Contact/High Comfort group on teacher ratings and WJ Reading scores."

Herman and Reinke 2017 (2)

Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M. (2017). Improving Teacher Perceptions of Parent Involvement Patterns: Findings From a Group Randomized Trial. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(1), 89-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000169

q3 · i? · causal · r2

The authors' interpretation of the person-centered profile results in the Discussion. They state this implies teacher discomfort is based on something other than actual contact, and suggest racial or socioeconomic differences and interpretation of student misbehavior as candidate explanations.

"Low contact alone was not associated with adverse student performance or out- comes."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.