The Low Contact/Low Comfort profile was more likely to contain parents of FRL and African American students¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? At baseline the Low Contact/Low Comfort class was significantly more likely to have FRL students than the High Contact/High Comfort class (OR: 2.79) and FRL (OR: 3.35) and African American students (OR: 13.51) than the Low Contact/High Comfort class. → Herman and Reinke 2017

Evidence¶

Herman and Reinke 2017¶

Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M. (2017). Improving Teacher Perceptions of Parent Involvement Patterns: Findings From a Group Randomized Trial. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(1), 89-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000169

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Demographic correlates of class membership examined with the Auxiliary function in MPlus. The article also reports at follow-up African American students were more likely to appear in the Low Contact/Low Comfort class compared to the High Contact/High Comfort class (OR: 5.56; 1.15–27.03).

"At baseline, the Low Contact/Low Comfort class was significantly more likely to have FRL stu- dents than the High Contact/High Comfort class (OR: 2.79; 1.59 –4.42); girls were more likely to appear in the Low Contact/Medium Comfort (OR: 1.73; 1.16 –2.41)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Four parent involvement profiles emerged, and the Low Contact/Low Comfort profile had the worst academic and behavioral correlates — related
• IY TCM intervention teachers were more likely to rate parents in the most adaptive involvement profiles at follow-up compared to control teachers — related
• Low contact alone was not associated with adverse student outcomes; the Low Contact/High Comfort profile had the most favorable correlates — related
• Demographic covariates were significantly associated with latent class membership — related