Low-level prompting, modeling, and information provision do not predict students' social reasoning at any lag¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Three of the seven coded instructional moves — low-level prompting, modeling, and information provision — showed no significant prediction of students' social reasoning at Lag-1, Lag-2, or Lag-3. → Nagpal 2025

Evidence¶

Nagpal 2025¶

Nagpal, M., Lin, T.-J., Kraatz, E., Kim, S., Ha, S. Y., & Glassman, M. (2025). Reciprocal interactions between teachers' instructional moves and students' social reasoning during collaborative small group discussions. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09718-7

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Null finding from the same SDA of the 24 Week-4 CSR discussions; the article reports these three moves "did not predict students' social reasoning at any lag turns." No effect sizes are printed for these null results, so no magnitude is reported here.

"Low-level prompting (e.g., repetition, clarification), modeling, and information provision did not predict students' social reasoning at any lag turns."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• High-level prompting and specific praise continue to predict students' social reasoning one turn later (Lag-2), suggesting a vicarious reinforcing experience — related
• Students' social reasoning in the previous three turns positively predicts social reasoning in the current turn — related
• Students' social reasoning is less likely to be followed by teachers' high-level prompting and more likely to be followed by specific praise — related