Claims

High-level prompting and specific praise continue to predict students' social reasoning one turn later (Lag-2), suggesting a vicarious reinforcing experience

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 At Lag-2 but not Lag-3, high-level prompting (OR = 1.86) and specific praise (OR = 6.30) remained significant predictors of students' social reasoning, which the authors suggest may reflect a vicarious reinforcing experience. → Nagpal 2025

Evidence

Nagpal 2025

Nagpal, M., Lin, T.-J., Kraatz, E., Kim, S., Ha, S. Y., & Glassman, M. (2025). Reciprocal interactions between teachers' instructional moves and students' social reasoning during collaborative small group discussions. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09718-7

q2 · i3 · associational · r2

Same SDA of the 24 Week-4 CSR discussions. The article reports the Lag-2 effects "remained significant" with odds ratios of 1.86 for high-level prompting and 6.30 for specific praise, and offers the vicarious reinforcement interpretation as a suggestion.

"At Lag-2 but not Lag-3, the effects of high-level prompting (B = 0.62, SE = 0.22, p = 0.00, 95% CI [0.18, 1.05]) and specific praise (B = 1.84, SE = 0.71, p = 0.01, 95% CI [0.44, 3.25]) remained significant, suggesting that high-level prompting and specific praise may have created a vicarious reinforcing experience for students to exercise their social reasoning"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id prompting-praise-delayed-effect-social-reasoning-lag2
title High-level prompting and specific praise continue to predict students' social reasoning one turn later (Lag-2), suggesting a vicarious reinforcing experience
description High-level prompting and specific praise continue to predict students' social reasoning one turn later (Lag-2), suggesting a vicarious reinforcing experience
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — nagpal-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.