Students' social reasoning in the previous three turns positively predicts social reasoning in the current turn¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i2 Prior students' social reasoning at Lag-1, Lag-2, and Lag-3 significantly and positively predicted current-turn social reasoning, with odds ratios of 3.97, 1.54, and 1.34. → Nagpal 2025

Evidence¶

Nagpal 2025¶

Nagpal, M., Lin, T.-J., Kraatz, E., Kim, S., Ha, S. Y., & Glassman, M. (2025). Reciprocal interactions between teachers' instructional moves and students' social reasoning during collaborative small group discussions. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09718-7

q2 · i2 · associational · r2

Same SDA of the 24 Week-4 CSR discussions; the autoregressive terms show "significantly and positively predicted social reasoning at the current turn" with odds ratios 3.97 (Lag-1), 1.54 (Lag-2), and 1.34 (Lag-3), indicating social reasoning builds on recent peer reasoning.

"The presence of students' social reasoning in all three previous turns (Lag-1, Lag-2, Lag-3) significantly and positively predicted social reasoning at the current turn (Lag-1: B = 1.38, SE = 0.10, p ≤ 0.001; Lag-2: B = 0.43, SE = 0.10, p < 0.001; Lag-3: B = 0.29, SE = 0.10, p = 0.001)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Low-level prompting, modeling, and information provision do not predict students' social reasoning at any lag — related
• High-level prompting and specific praise continue to predict students' social reasoning one turn later (Lag-2), suggesting a vicarious reinforcing experience — related
• Students' social reasoning is less likely to be followed by teachers' high-level prompting and more likely to be followed by specific praise — related