Claims

At low pretest WMC, control children outperformed the strategy conditions on solution accuracy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? For children at the low WMC level, posttest scores were higher in the control condition than in the strategy conditions. → Swanson et al. 2013

Evidence

Swanson et al. 2013

H. Lee Swanson, Michael J. Orosco, Cathy Lussier. (2013). Does Cognitive Strategy Training on Word Problems Compensate for Working Memory Capacity in Children with Math Difficulties? SREE Spring 2013 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563039

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Adjusted posttest means at the low pretest WMC level (z = -.50) in the randomized ANCOVA, collapsed across ability group. The article reports "Post-test scores were higher for the control condition than the strategy conditions", consistent with the hypothesis that low-WMC children may be overtaxed by strategies.

"For the low WMC level, the adjusted z-post-test means (collapsed across ability group) were .26, .59, .36, and .75 for verbal-only, verbal+visual, visual-only and control conditions, respectively. Post-test scores were higher for the control condition than the strategy conditions."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.