Claims

Strategy training outcomes on word problem accuracy interact with working memory capacity, favoring children with higher WMC

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A significant treatment x WMC interaction emerged on CMAT solution accuracy, F(3,140)=4.25, p < .01. → Swanson et al. 2013

Evidence

Swanson et al. 2013

H. Lee Swanson, Michael J. Orosco, Cathy Lussier. (2013). Does Cognitive Strategy Training on Word Problems Compensate for Working Memory Capacity in Children with Math Difficulties? SREE Spring 2013 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563039

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Mixed model ANCOVA of the randomized 2 (MD vs. NMD) x 4 (treatment) design on posttest CMAT solution accuracy, with pretest accuracy and WMC as covariates. The article reports "A significant effect emerged for the treatment x WMC interaction"; the risk x treatment x WMC interaction only approached significance, p < .10.

"A significant effect emerged for the treatment x WMC interaction, F (3,140) =4.25, p < .01 and the pretest CMAT score, F (1,140) =76.70, p < .001."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.