Cluster analysis across both studies identifies three meta-attention knowledge profiles, including an overconfident group with a self-knowledge/strategy mismatch¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? K-means clustering yielded a three-cluster solution in both studies: high-knowledge, low-knowledge, and overconfident (Study One: n = 124, 42.3% with below-average strategy knowledge but above-average self-perception of control and monitoring). → Mulvihill 2025
Evidence¶
Mulvihill 2025¶
Mulvihill, A., Matthews, N., Chidley, K., Macmahon, S., Armitage, K. L., Sherlock, D., Dux, P. E., & Carroll, A. (2025). The meta-attention knowledge questionnaire (MAKQ): a new instrument for investigating meta-attention in a young adolescent sample. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09433-1
q2 · i? · design · r2
Exploratory k-means cluster analysis in Study One (N = 293) on standardised MAKQ dimension scores; three clusters: low-knowledge (n = 98, 33.4%), high-knowledge (n = 71, 24.2%), overconfident (n = 124, 42.3%). Study Two (N = 83) replicated the same three-cluster solution.
"a third overconfident cluster ( n = 124, 42.3%) presented below average strategy knowledge yet displayed above average self-perception of meta-attention control and monitoring capacity. Evidently this group presented low self-awareness in that they self-identified strong meta-attention skills but possessed limited strategy knowledge"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Cluster analysis identifies three stable learner profiles: Engaged and Literate, Uncritical Reliant, and Skeptical Minimal users — related
- Exploratory K-means clustering identifies four heterogeneous student AI-user profiles differing in experience, competence, usefulness, trust, and control, but the solution's optimality and stability are not established — related
- K-Means++ clustering of self-reported behavioral proxies yields six distinct, stable learner profiles (k = 6, Silhouette = 0.62) — related
- The MAKQ self-knowledge items show a stable two-factor structure: meta-attention control (15 items) and meta-attention monitoring (5 items) — related
- Affinity propagation clustering of gameplay attempts yielded an interpretable six-cluster solution (part.6)
- Three distinct learner profiles emerge from function art activities: Repetitivists, Simplists, and Multifunctionists — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
makq-three-meta-attention-profiles |
title |
Cluster analysis across both studies identifies three meta-attention knowledge profiles, including an overconfident group with a self-knowledge/strategy mismatch |
description |
Cluster analysis across both studies identifies three meta-attention knowledge profiles, including an overconfident group with a self-knowledge/strategy mismatch |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mulvihill-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.