Wagner marketing incubator participants outscored non-participants on end-of-semester critical thinking prompts by 16.95%, significant at the 11% two-tailed level¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? At the end of the semester, marketing incubator participants scored a total average mean of 4.07 versus 3.48 for non-participants, a 16.95% better total average score with two-tailed t test significance within 11% and one-tailed significance within 6%. → DeSimone and Buzza 2013
Evidence¶
DeSimone and Buzza 2013¶
Frank DeSimone and John Buzza. (2013). Experiential Learning: Improving The Efficacy Of An Undergraduate Business Degree. American Journal Of Business Education, 6(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1054187
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Quasi-experimental comparison within one Consumer Behavior class (18 incubator participants, 16 controls, same syllabus and professor), scored by two graduate assistants on a 7-point SOLO grid. The article reports a "16.95% better total average score" for participants, with significance only at the 11% two-tailed / 6% one-tailed level.
"Those that did not participate in the marketing incubator scored a total average mean of 3.48 on both prompts at the end of the semester. Those that did participate in the marketing incubator at the end of the semester scored a total average mean of 4.07 on both prompts. This represents a 16.95% better total average score for those that participated in the marketing incubator than those that did not with two-tailed t test significance within 11% and one-tailed t test significance within 6%."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students who chose to join the marketing incubator started the semester with critical thinking scores about 10% higher than those who did not — related
- Wagner students' overall pre-to-post critical thinking prompt gain of 9.8% was not statistically significant — related
- Monmouth entrepreneurial program: two of three prompt comparisons improved significantly, one declined significantly, and the combined 7.39% gain was not significant — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.