Claims

Wagner students' overall pre-to-post critical thinking prompt gain of 9.8% was not statistically significant

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2016: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The combined average prompt score improved 9.8% from beginning to end of semester, but the two-tailed t-test indicated a statistically insignificant result. → DeSimone and Buzza 2013

Evidence

DeSimone and Buzza 2013

Frank DeSimone and John Buzza. (2013). Experiential Learning: Improving The Efficacy Of An Undergraduate Business Degree. American Journal Of Business Education, 6(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1054187

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pre-post comparison for all 32 Wagner Consumer Behavior students surveyed on September 20 and December 8, 2011, with prompts reversed and scores averaged across two graduate assistants. The article reports the 9.8% gain was "a statistically insignificant result" (two-tailed p reported as 0.21).

"While the overall improvement in the student average mean prompt scores was 9.8%, the two-tailed t-test results indicated a 0.21 significance, or, a statistically insignificant result."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.