Claims

Students who chose to join the marketing incubator started the semester with critical thinking scores about 10% higher than those who did not

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The average beginning combined score was 3.68 for incubator participants versus 3.34 for non-participants, a mean score 10% higher to begin with. → DeSimone and Buzza 2013

Evidence

DeSimone and Buzza 2013

Frank DeSimone and John Buzza. (2013). Experiential Learning: Improving The Efficacy Of An Undergraduate Business Degree. American Journal Of Business Education, 6(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1054187

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Baseline comparison within the same Wagner Consumer Behavior class before the experiential treatment. The article reports the participating group's beginning mean was "10% higher to begin with" and states this deserves future study.

"the average beginning combined score for those that participated was 3.68 as compared with an average beginning prompt score of 3.34 for those that did not, or a mean score that was 10% higher to begin with."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.