Students who chose to join the marketing incubator started the semester with critical thinking scores about 10% higher than those who did not¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The average beginning combined score was 3.68 for incubator participants versus 3.34 for non-participants, a mean score 10% higher to begin with. → DeSimone and Buzza 2013
Evidence¶
DeSimone and Buzza 2013¶
Frank DeSimone and John Buzza. (2013). Experiential Learning: Improving The Efficacy Of An Undergraduate Business Degree. American Journal Of Business Education, 6(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1054187
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Baseline comparison within the same Wagner Consumer Behavior class before the experiential treatment. The article reports the participating group's beginning mean was "10% higher to begin with" and states this deserves future study.
"the average beginning combined score for those that participated was 3.68 as compared with an average beginning prompt score of 3.34 for those that did not, or a mean score that was 10% higher to begin with."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Wagner marketing incubator participants outscored non-participants on end-of-semester critical thinking prompts by 16.95%, significant at the 11% two-tailed level — related
- Wagner students' overall pre-to-post critical thinking prompt gain of 9.8% was not statistically significant — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.