Claims

MR and RLE groups report similar stress, exhaustion, and self-efficacy levels after mass casualty incident training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The MR and RLE groups reported similar stress, exhaustion, and self-efficacy levels. → Baetzner 2025

Evidence

Baetzner 2025

Baetzner, A. S., Gerwann, S., Uhl, J. C., Schuster, B., Sjöberg, D., Wenighofer, R., Frenkel, M. O., & Wrzus, C. (2025). Mixed reality and real-life exercises for mass casualty incidents: a comparison of psychological responses and learning. Education Tech Research Dev, 73, 2861–2875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10517-7

q2 · i? · design · r2

Descriptive comparison of questionnaire data from 34 MR participants and 14 RLE participants; the article reports no inferential test statistic, so no effect size is available.

"The MR and RLE groups reported similar stress, exhaustion, and self-efficacy levels."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.