Claims

English learners' progress beyond the significant risk level differed by test language: 21 percent stayed above threshold in English and 19 percent improved to it, versus 11 percent improving in Spanish

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among English learners taking assessments in English and Spanish, about 21 percent of students above the significant risk threshold in English at beginning of year were still there at end of year and another 19 percent improved to that level, while in Spanish fewer students (11%) improved beyond the significant risk level. → Lemke 2025

Evidence

Lemke 2025

Lemke, M., Faulkner-Bond, M., LeBeau, B., Soo Ping Chow, A., & Quesen, S. (2025). Early literacy performance in Massachusetts: Results of ongoing analysis of literacy screening assessments (2023/24 data). WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED677571

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Analysis of English learners taking Star screening assessments in both English and Spanish, comparing through-year patterns by language. The report prints that in Spanish "fewer students (11%) improved beyond the significant risk level"; no effect size is printed.

"In English, about 21 percent of students who performed above the significant risk threshold at the beginning of the year were still there by the end of the year, and another 19 percent improved to that level. In Spanish, fewer students (11%) improved beyond the significant risk level."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id massachusetts-english-learner-spanish-english-screener-divergence
title English learners' progress beyond the significant risk level differed by test language: 21 percent stayed above threshold in English and 19 percent improved to it, versus 11 percent improving in Spanish
description English learners' progress beyond the significant risk level differed by test language: 21 percent stayed above threshold in English and 19 percent improved to it, versus 11 percent improving in Spanish
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lemke-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.