For effective self-regulators, mastery goals have a large positive and performance-avoidance goals a small negative effect on metacognition¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the path model for effective self-regulators, mastery goals had a large positive effect (standardized β=.50) and performance-avoidance goals a small negative effect (β=-.15) on metacognition. → Anneke Vrugt & Frans J. Oort 2008
Evidence¶
Anneke Vrugt & Frans J. Oort 2008¶
Anneke Vrugt & Frans J. Oort. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: pathways to achievement. Metacognition Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Structural equation modeling of the hypothesized model fitted to 421 effective self-regulators (first-year psychology students), with gender, age and intellectual ability controlled. Table 2 reports standardized coefficients β=.50 (mastery→metacognition) and β=-.15 (avoidance→metacognition); the article notes values of 0.5 are considered "large" and 0.1 "small".
"Consistent with expectation mastery goals had a large positive and performance-avoidance goals had a small negative effect on metacognition and through metacognition on the use of each of the four study strategies."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Mastery and performance-approach goals positively predict self-efficacy while performance-avoidance goals negatively predict it across all three grade levels — related
- Six relationships in the model differ for less effective self-regulators, including performance-avoidance goals being unrelated to metacognition — related
- Performance-approach goals are directly related to the use of surface cognitive and resource management strategies in effective self-regulators — related
- Most motivational and self-regulation measures did not differ by competitive preference, though overall interest in educational psychology declined over the semester — related
- Mastery-approach goals are positively related to time management, while performance-approach relations are inconsistent and performance-avoidance goals show no association — related
- Autonomous achievement goal complexes predict adaptive outcomes over and above goals alone and reasons alone — related
- Performance goals regulate conflict with more-competent others toward competitive (approach) or protective (avoidance) interpersonal behavior — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mastery-goals-large-positive-avoidance-negative-metacognition |
title |
For effective self-regulators, mastery goals have a large positive and performance-avoidance goals a small negative effect on metacognition |
description |
For effective self-regulators, mastery goals have a large positive and performance-avoidance goals a small negative effect on metacognition |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2008 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — anneke-vrugt-frans-j-oort-2008 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.