Claims

Facets of mastery goals, but not population, moderate goal-emotion interrelations

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Facets of mastery goals were identified as relevant moderators of the interrelations among achievement goals and emotions, in contrast to population. → Tanja Bross 2024

Evidence

Tanja Bross 2024

Tanja Bross, Ulrike Elisabeth Nett, & Martin Daumiller. (2024). Interrelations Among Achievement Goals and Achievement Emotions: A Meta-Analytic Examination. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09931-9

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

In moderator analyses across the pooled effect sizes, the differentiation of mastery goals into task versus learning facets emerged as a relevant moderator, whereas population (students, teachers, athletes, etc.) did not moderate the interrelations.

"Facets of mastery goals were identified as relevant moderators of the interrelations among achievement goals and emotions, in contrast to population."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id mastery-facets-moderate-goal-emotion-links
title Facets of mastery goals, but not population, moderate goal-emotion interrelations
description Facets of mastery goals, but not population, moderate goal-emotion interrelations
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tanja-bross-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.