Claims

Mastery learning shifted the post-test score distribution upward: 69.08% of mastery students scored 80% and above versus 17.53% of control students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the mastery learning group 69.08% of students scored 80% and above on the post-test, while only 17.53% of the control group reached that level; about half of control students (49.48%) scored 40–49% versus less than 1% of mastery students. → Telimoye Leesi Mitee and Georgina N. Obaitan 2015

Evidence

Telimoye Leesi Mitee and Georgina N. Obaitan 2015

Telimoye Leesi Mitee and Georgina N. Obaitan. (2015). Effect of Mastery Learning on Senior Secondary School Students' Cognitive Learning Outcome in Quantitative Chemistry. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.5. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083639

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Frequency distribution of post-test scores (Table 2) for the 207-student mastery group and 194-student control group. The article also reports "About half of the students (49.48%) in the control group scored between 40 and 49 whereas less than one percent (1%) of the students in the m astery learning group scored in this range."

"Table 2 shows that 69.08% of the students in the ma stery learning group scored 80% and above in the po st-test while only 17.53% of the students in the control gr oup attained this level."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.