Multimedia-based biology instruction produces higher biology achievement than teacher-centred instruction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Grade 12 students taught with a multimedia biology tool scored significantly higher on a post-test of nervous-system content than students taught with teacher-centred instruction. → Koseoglu 2015
q3 i? Pre-test biology achievement scores did not differ significantly between the multimedia and teacher-centred groups, supporting comparable baseline readiness. → Koseoglu 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Koseoglu 2015¶
Koseoglu, P., & Efendioglu, A. (2015). Can a Multimedia Tool Help Students' Learning Performance in Complex Biology Subjects? South African Journal of Education, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n4a1169
q3 · i? · causal · r2
ANCOVA on post-test scores of 48 Grade 12 students (Mbio n = 26, TCbio n = 22) after a five-week intervention on the nervous system. The article reports a significant group effect, "F (1-45) = 17.071; p < 0.001", favouring the multimedia group. No standardised effect size is printed for this contrast.
"According to Table 2, it is determined that there is a significant difference between the post-BA scores of the students in the Mbio and TCbio groups [ F (1-45) = 17.071; p < 0.001]."
Koseoglu 2015 (2)¶
Koseoglu, P., & Efendioglu, A. (2015). Can a Multimedia Tool Help Students' Learning Performance in Complex Biology Subjects? South African Journal of Education, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n4a1169
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Independent-samples t-test on pre-test scores confirmed baseline equivalence between the multimedia (n = 26) and teacher-centred (n = 22) groups: "t (46) = 1.294, p > 0.05". No effect size is printed for this null result.
"According to Table 1, it is determined that there is no significant difference between the students in the Mbio and TCbio groups in terms of their pre-BA test scores [ t (46) = 1.294, p > 0.05]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The multimedia group's adjusted post-test mean (21.01) exceeded the teacher-centred group's (15.07) — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Secondary students taught in an e-classroom with ICT resources significantly outperform students taught by conventional methods on post-test achievement — a broader claim this one bears on
- Web-based multimedia virtual simulation embedded in PowerPoint teaching increases Form Four students' achievement on the Islamic Studies pilgrimage topic compared with PowerPoint teaching without simulation — related
- Integrating YouTube videos into EFL instruction produced significantly higher post-test content learning than lecture-based instruction — related
- Undergraduate students taught IUPAC nomenclature of organic chemistry through an e-content package scored significantly higher on the post-test than students taught by conventional methods — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.