Claims

Teachers without mentors reached the impact level more often than mentored teachers, raising the question that mentoring may inhibit development

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1990 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on an ERIC document (a report, conference paper or thesis). It is kept because 3 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Seven of nineteen teachers without mentors (37%) reached the impact level in the third interview versus four of twenty teachers with mentors (20%), leading the authors to question whether mentors inhibited mentee development. → Olsen 1990

Evidence

Olsen 1990

Olsen, Dwayne G.; Heyse, Kathy L. (1990). Development and Concerns of First-year and Reentry Teachers with and without Mentors. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED323188

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Discussion-section comparison across the study's four volunteer groups, contrasting mentored and unmentored teachers' final-interview concern levels. The authors quote Fuller and Bown's conclusion that the research question must be what kinds of interventions by what interveners elicit what responses from which subjects.

"the question of whether the mentors inhibited the development of their mentees must be raised since seven of nineteen teachers without mentors (37%) reached the "impact" level in the third interview while cnly four of twenty first-year and reentry teachers with mentors (20%) identified "impact" concerns"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id mentors-may-inhibit-concern-development
title Teachers without mentors reached the impact level more often than mentored teachers, raising the question that mentoring may inhibit development
description Teachers without mentors reached the impact level more often than mentored teachers, raising the question that mentoring may inhibit development
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1990
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — olsen-1990

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.