Claims

Teachers' concerns follow a developmental trend from lower to higher stages during curriculum implementation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1977 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on an ERIC document (a report, conference paper or thesis). It is kept because 2 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Over a year of SCIS implementation, teachers' concerns at Stages 0, 1, and 2 decreased over time while concerns at Stages 4, 5, and 6 increased, supporting the developmental hypothesis. → Loucks 1977

Evidence

Loucks 1977

Loucks, Susan F. (1977). Concerns Expressed by Elementary School Teachers about the Implementation of the SCIS Curriculum. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED250163

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Longitudinal SoCQ study of Kansas elementary teachers implementing SCIS, assessed five times from May 1975 to April 1976; thirty individuals provided data at every period. The article reports "a general developmental trend" in concerns across the analyses.

"Stages of Concern for individuals in the sample followed a general developmental trend from being more intense at the lower Stages of Concern to becoming more intense at the higher Stages of Concern."

Studies bearing on this claim

Do adopters' concerns move in the expected order, from self through task to impact concerns, over a period of use? This table gathers the studies behind this claim and the 6 narrower claims that bear on it: 4 distinct studies (2 associational, 1 qualitative, 1 theoretical), q1–q2, 0 of 4 with an effect size coded. One row per study, codes as each entry records them; no effect is averaged and no verdict is drawn. Built by scripts/synthesize_claim.py from eval/synthesis/; a row that looks wrong is fixed on the claim it comes from.

Study Design Effect as recorded Bears on this claim through
Loucks 1977 q1 / q2 · associational · r1 i? this claim; The two-week SCIS workshop shifted participants' concerns from lower-stage nonuser pattern (supports); Individual teachers' concern profiles vary widely and can diverge from group trends during (qualifies)
Olsen 1990 q2 · associational · r1 i? Teacher concern development is better characterized as progression and retreat than linear (qualifies); Teachers without mentors reached the impact level more often than mentored teachers, raisi (qualifies)
Wesley 1996 q2 · qualitative · r2 i? Early self- and task-related concerns are maintained alongside later impact concerns as ad (qualifies)
Hall 1983 q1 · theoretical · r2 i? Not all educators develop impact concerns even when colleagues do; concern change cannot b (qualifies)

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id stages-of-concern-developmental-trend
title Teachers' concerns follow a developmental trend from lower to higher stages during curriculum implementation
description Teachers' concerns follow a developmental trend from lower to higher stages during curriculum implementation
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1977
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — loucks-1977

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.