Claims

Nursing students perceived that SBL using technology can enhance critical thinking development through opportunities for meta-cognition and reflection

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students reported perceived value in thinking about their own actions and thinking, self-reflection, self-evaluation, and feedback in debriefing sessions. → Stenseth Hege Vistven et al 2025

Evidence

Stenseth Hege Vistven et al 2025

Stenseth Hege Vistven et al. (2025). Simulation-Based Learning Supported by Technology to Enhance Critical Thinking in Nursing Students: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/58744

q2 · i? · review · r3

Net benefits theme of the D&M-mapped thematic analysis; the review reports students' perceptions that "SBL using technology can enhance critical thinking development through opportunities for meta-cognition and engagement in reflection."

"Nursing students reported that they perceived that SBL using technology can enhance critical thinking development through opportunities for meta-cognition and engagement in reflection [58,75,77,97,123,138]."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.