Claims

Feedback and validation, including feedback on actions taken and provision of examples and explanations, are perceived as enabling critical thinking development in SBL using technology

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Feedback on actions taken and feedback with examples and explanations of patient care were perceived as valuable and enabling critical thinking development; insufficient or absent feedback led to uncertainty about performance. → Stenseth Hege Vistven et al 2025

Evidence

Stenseth Hege Vistven et al 2025

Stenseth Hege Vistven et al. (2025). Simulation-Based Learning Supported by Technology to Enhance Critical Thinking in Nursing Students: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/58744

q2 · i? · review · r2

Thematic synthesis under the Validation theme of the D&M-mapped analysis; the review reports that "Insufficient or absence of feedback led to uncertainties regarding nursing students' own performance and the accuracy of their problem-solving."

"Insufficient or absence of feedback led to uncertainties regarding nursing students' own performance and the accuracy of their problem-solving, ultimately influencing the learning experience and development of critical thinking skills [58,81,85]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.