Claims

Engagement and motivation, including safe learning environment, immersion, and autonomy, are prominent enablers of critical thinking in technologically supported SBL

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across 13/42 studies, students reported that TESs provided a safe learning environment where immersion, curiosity, and activation of thoughts and feelings enabled engagement and critical thinking development. → Stenseth Hege Vistven et al 2025

Evidence

Stenseth Hege Vistven et al 2025

Stenseth Hege Vistven et al. (2025). Simulation-Based Learning Supported by Technology to Enhance Critical Thinking in Nursing Students: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/58744

q2 · i? · review · r3

Thematic analysis of RQ 3 data from included studies; the review reports that "TESs provided a safe learning environment" where immersion and curiosity "facilitated the development of critical thinking for nursing students."

"Across several studies (13/42, 31%), nursing students reported that TESs provided a safe learning environment [87,88,109,110,112,122,124,126] where a high level of immersion [92,97,103,108,110,112,126], sparked curiosity [108,113,126], and the activation of thoughts and feelings [92,108,122,131] enabled involvement and engagement and facilitated the development of critical thinking for nursing students."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.