Metacognitive strategies and prior coding experience significantly predict CT profile membership, with metacognition contributing more strongly¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In linear discriminant analysis, metacognitive strategies (standardized coefficient = .78) and prior coding experience significantly predicted Proficient profile membership. → Tanya Chichekian 2026
Evidence¶
Tanya Chichekian 2026¶
Tanya Chichekian, Maria Cutumisu, Annie Savard and Yi-Mei Zhang. (2026). Profiling Pre-service Teachers' Computational Thinking: The Role of Metacognition and Coding Experience. Journal of Learning Analytics, 13(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2026.9077
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Linear discriminant analysis (Box's M = 4.747, p = .593, equal covariance assumption met) tested metacognitive strategies and coding experience as predictors of profile membership. The article reports "Wilks' λ = .62, p < .001" with metacognition contributing more strongly (standardized discriminant coefficient = .78). That coefficient is a weight within the discriminant function, not a between-group effect size, so no magnitude of the kind the i code reads (a d or equivalent) is printed; the analysis is associational and cannot show that metacognition or coding experience causes profile membership.
"MetaCog (M = 5.73, SD = .84) and CodExp significantly predicted Proficient profile membership (Wilks' λ = .62, p < .001), with MetaCog contributing more strongly (standardized coefficient = .78)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Self-Regulation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Metacognition — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Self Regulated Learning Predicts Achievement — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Latent profile analysis of pre-service teachers' CT skills identifies three profiles (Novice, Developing, Proficient), revealing heterogeneous, non-linear skill acquisition — related
- Metacognitive strategies correlate strongly with problem-solving skills, and behavioural metrics correlate with task performance — related
- Proficient learners complete the CT task faster and with fewer clicks than Novice and Developing learners — related
- Proficient learners report lower perceived task difficulty than Novice learners on the CT task — related
- Metacognitive strategies, effort regulation, and coping with problems significantly predict Japanese EFL learners' proficiency — related
- Prior coding experience correlates positively with digital literacy and coding comfort and negatively with perceived task difficulty — related
- Prior programming experience significantly predicted Promptly task performance and prompting self-efficacy — related
- Metacognition is significantly and positively associated with EFL students' critical thinking skills (Model 2) — related
- All metacognitive strategy factors and critical thinking subfactors were significantly and positively correlated with each other and with academic writing — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
metacognition-coding-experience-predict-ct-profile |
title |
Metacognitive strategies and prior coding experience significantly predict CT profile membership, with metacognition contributing more strongly |
description |
Metacognitive strategies and prior coding experience significantly predict CT profile membership, with metacognition contributing more strongly |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — tanya-chichekian-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.