Claims

Metacognitive strategies and prior coding experience significantly predict CT profile membership, with metacognition contributing more strongly

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In linear discriminant analysis, metacognitive strategies (standardized coefficient = .78) and prior coding experience significantly predicted Proficient profile membership. → Tanya Chichekian 2026

Evidence

Tanya Chichekian 2026

Tanya Chichekian, Maria Cutumisu, Annie Savard and Yi-Mei Zhang. (2026). Profiling Pre-service Teachers' Computational Thinking: The Role of Metacognition and Coding Experience. Journal of Learning Analytics, 13(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2026.9077

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Linear discriminant analysis (Box's M = 4.747, p = .593, equal covariance assumption met) tested metacognitive strategies and coding experience as predictors of profile membership. The article reports "Wilks' λ = .62, p < .001" with metacognition contributing more strongly (standardized discriminant coefficient = .78). That coefficient is a weight within the discriminant function, not a between-group effect size, so no magnitude of the kind the i code reads (a d or equivalent) is printed; the analysis is associational and cannot show that metacognition or coding experience causes profile membership.

"MetaCog (M = 5.73, SD = .84) and CodExp significantly predicted Proficient profile membership (Wilks' λ = .62, p < .001), with MetaCog contributing more strongly (standardized coefficient = .78)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id metacognition-coding-experience-predict-ct-profile
title Metacognitive strategies and prior coding experience significantly predict CT profile membership, with metacognition contributing more strongly
description Metacognitive strategies and prior coding experience significantly predict CT profile membership, with metacognition contributing more strongly
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tanya-chichekian-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.