Method-by-gender interaction is significant only for application of Light waves, not for understanding or analysis¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The interaction of Method and Gender is significant for application of Light waves (F = 3.488 exceeds critical 2.76). → Obafemi 2015 q2 i? The interaction of Method and Gender is not significant for understanding (F = 0.521) or analysis (F = 0.793) of Light waves. → Obafemi 2015 (2)

Evidence¶

Obafemi 2015¶

Obafemi, D. T. A. (2015). Bridging Gender Gap in the Physics Classroom: The Instructional Method Perspective. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079043

q2 · i? · causal · r1

The 4x2 ANCOVA of application of Light waves (Table 4) shows a significant Method * Gender interaction, F = 3.488 against a critical value of 2.76; no effect size is printed.

"Table 4 shows that the interaction of Method and Gender is significant since its calculated F 3,46 value is 3.488 at degree of freedom of 3,46 and probability level of 0.05 against the F 3,46 critical value of 2.76."

Obafemi 2015 (2)¶

Obafemi, D. T. A. (2015). Bridging Gender Gap in the Physics Classroom: The Instructional Method Perspective. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079043

q2 · i? · causal · r1

The 4x2 ANCOVA of analysis of Light waves (Table 8) shows the Method * Gender interaction is not significant, F = 0.793 against a critical value of 2.76; the understanding ANCOVA (Table 3) likewise reports F = 0.521, not significant.

"Table 8 shows that the interaction of Method and Gender is not significant since its calculated F 3,46 value is 0.793 at degree of freedom of 3,46 and probability level of 0.05 against the F 3,46 critical value of 2.76."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Male and female students differ significantly in application of Light waves, favouring males — related
• Male students taught with Guided-discovery method contributed most to the gender difference in application of Light waves — related
• Male and female students show no significant difference in understanding of Light waves — related
• Male and female students show no significant difference in analysis of Light waves — related
• No significant interaction between gender and instructional method on basic science achievement — reports the opposite