The effect of multiple intelligence practices does not differ significantly by instructional level¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Elementary (1,194) and secondary (1,564) effect sizes did not differ significantly (QB=3,767; p=0,052); university-level studies were excluded for insufficient number. → Eyüp Yurt & Seyat Polat 2015
Evidence¶
Eyüp Yurt & Seyat Polat 2015¶
Eyüp Yurt & Seyat Polat. (2015). The Effectiveness of Multiple Intelligence Applications on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Social Studies Education Research 6(1), 84-122. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105368
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Sub-group moderator analysis comparing elementary and secondary levels; university-level studies (4 studies) were not included because the number was not enough to make a comparison. No significant difference was found.
"average effect size of the studies calculated according to elementary and secondary levels were found to be 1,194 and 1,564 respectively. On the other hand, the result of the homogeneity test showed that there was not a significant difference between the calculated effect size values of studies according to instructional level (QB=3,767; p=0,052)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Effectiveness of educational materials does not differ significantly across educational levels (primary, secondary, university) — related
- The effect of multiple intelligence practices on achievement increases as the implementation period becomes longer — related
- The achievement effect of cooperative learning differs significantly across student grade levels, largest at university level (d+ = 1.33) — related
- The effect of computer-based teaching on academic success differs significantly by grade level, with the largest effect in secondary schools (ES = 1.31) and the smallest in primary schools (ES = .66) — related
- Attitude effects of STEM practices differ significantly by education level but not by publication type or lesson type — related
- The effect of multiple intelligence practices does not differ significantly by type of study (article, master's thesis, doctoral thesis) — related
- Effect sizes do not differ significantly by education level, though primary school applications showed the largest point estimate (g = 1.564) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.