Claims

The effect of multiple intelligence practices does not differ significantly by instructional level

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Elementary (1,194) and secondary (1,564) effect sizes did not differ significantly (QB=3,767; p=0,052); university-level studies were excluded for insufficient number. → Eyüp Yurt & Seyat Polat 2015

Evidence

Eyüp Yurt & Seyat Polat 2015

Eyüp Yurt & Seyat Polat. (2015). The Effectiveness of Multiple Intelligence Applications on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Social Studies Education Research 6(1), 84-122. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105368

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Sub-group moderator analysis comparing elementary and secondary levels; university-level studies (4 studies) were not included because the number was not enough to make a comparison. No significant difference was found.

"average effect size of the studies calculated according to elementary and secondary levels were found to be 1,194 and 1,564 respectively. On the other hand, the result of the homogeneity test showed that there was not a significant difference between the calculated effect size values of studies according to instructional level (QB=3,767; p=0,052)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.