Claims

Effect sizes do not differ significantly by education level, though primary school applications showed the largest point estimate (g = 1.564)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Between-group heterogeneity by education level was not statistically significant (Q = 5.386 below the critical value of 5.991), although primary school studies showed the largest point estimate. → Fulya Turk 2017

Evidence

Fulya Turk 2017

Fulya Turk. (2017). Evaluation of the Effects of Conflict Resolution, Peace Education and Peer Mediation: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Education Studies; Vol. 11, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n1p25

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis comparing primary school (14 studies, g = 1.564), high school (7, g = 0.782) and university (2, g = 0.871). The descriptive ordering favored primary schools, but the between-group test was not significant (Q = 5.386 < 5.991).

"the effect size values of the studies carried out at the primary education institutions are greater than ot her education levels with a value of g= 1,564"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.