Claims

The effect of multiple intelligence practices on achievement increases as the implementation period becomes longer

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Average effect sizes for '3 weeks and less', '4-6 weeks', and '7 weeks and more' were 0,868; 1,274 and 1,606 respectively, with a significant difference between periods (QB=8,303; p=0,016). → Eyüp Yurt & Seyat Polat 2015

Evidence

Eyüp Yurt & Seyat Polat 2015

Eyüp Yurt & Seyat Polat. (2015). The Effectiveness of Multiple Intelligence Applications on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Social Studies Education Research 6(1), 84-122. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105368

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Sub-group moderator analysis of the 81 comparisons classified by implementation period into three groups. The homogeneity test showed a significant difference; the article concludes the effect increases as the implementation period becomes longer.

"According to results of the analysis, average effect size of these studies was calculated as 0,868; 1, 274 and 1,606 respectively. The result of the homogeneity test showed that there was a significant difference between these effect size values according to their implementation process (Q B=8,303; p=0,016)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.