The experimental and control groups did not differ significantly on the pre test¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Pre-test scores were statistically equivalent across groups, supporting comparability at baseline. → Rina Oktaviyanthi 2015
Evidence¶
Rina Oktaviyanthi 2015¶
Rina Oktaviyanthi, Yani Supriani. (2015). Experimental Design: Utilizing Microsoft Mathematics in Teaching and Learning Calculus. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1078520
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive comparison of pre-test scores (experimental mean 74.3182, control mean 72.5455, n = 11 per group) with Shapiro-Wilk normality checks; the article reports no significant differences and no effect size. Equivalence was not formally tested.
"According to Table5 above, there are no significant differences from two groups in pre test results. I t means that the level of students in two groups gene rally is the equal."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- First-year students taught Calculus with Microsoft Mathematics achieved higher post-test scores than students taught conventionally — related
- Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly on pre-test NOS or SK scores — related
- Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in pre-test science achievement before the intervention — related
- Chatbot and search engine classes showed no significant baseline differences in science learning ability and knowledge before the intervention — related
- No significant pre-test difference existed between the two groups' entry listening knowledge — related
- Experimental and control groups were equivalent in vocabulary before the glossing treatment — related
- The experimental and control classes were statistically equivalent before the intervention on prior economics achievement — related
- High and low CT groups showed comparable prior coding knowledge before the AICA intervention — related
- The three groups were equivalent on EPT pre-test scores before the intervention — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.