Claims

Within the mind-map planning group, pre-to-post gains are significant on most self-regulation strategies and motivational beliefs, including a significant test-anxiety decrease

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's pre-post differences were significant at p<.01 for elaboration, organisation, metacognitive self-regulation, time and study environment, intrinsic goal orientation and test anxiety, and at p<.05 for effort management. → Tanriseven 2014

Evidence

Tanriseven 2014

Tanriseven, I. (2014). A Tool That Can Be Effective in the Self-regulated Learning of Pre-service Teachers: The Mind Map. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n1.1

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired sample t-test analysis within the experimental group (n=30, df=29) in the same quasi-experiment; the printed table shows test anxiety decreased (t=3.104, p=.004) while strategy and motivation scores increased.

"Table 3 shows there is a meaningful difference between the experimental group’s pre- and post-test scores at a p<.01 level for elaboration, organisation, metacognitive self-regulation, time and work environment, intrinsic goal orientation and test anxiety."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.