Claims

Mind-map task planning raises pre-service teachers' intrinsic goal orientation and self-efficacy more than direct task completion

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group had higher intrinsic goal orientation and self-efficacy post-test scores than the control group. → Tanriseven 2014

Evidence

Tanriseven 2014

Tanriseven, I. (2014). A Tool That Can Be Effective in the Self-regulated Learning of Pre-service Teachers: The Mind Map. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n1.1

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Conclusion section of the quasi-experiment (n=30 per group), consistent with the independent sample t-test on MSLQ motivational belief scales reported in Table 2; the article reports the difference as meaningful without printing an effect size.

"Based on the study results, it can be said that the experimental group had higher intrinsic goal-orientation and self-efficacy scores than the control group."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.