Underhand serve success scores did not differ significantly between the mind map and conventional-method groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The mean total underhand serve success scores of the experimental and control groups were not significantly different (U=427.000, p>.05). → Temiz 2023

Evidence¶

Temiz 2023¶

Temiz, C. N., & Sivrikaya, A. H. (2023). Mind map technique in physical education: Development of cognitive and psychomotor skills. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi [Journal of Theoretical Educational Science], 16(1), 20-40. http://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1175006

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Mann-Whitney U test comparing total underhand serve success scores between the experimental group (n=33, mean rank 37.06) and control group (n=33, mean rank 29.94), reported in Table 9. No significant difference was found; equivalence was not tested and no effect size is printed.

"the mean total underhand serve success scores of the experimental group and control group were not significantly different ( U=427.000; p>.05)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The mind map group's total overhand pass success score was significantly higher than the control group's — related
• The mind map group's total volleyball success score was significantly higher than the control group's, with a large printed effect size — related
• Both teaching methods improved bump pass scores, but the mind map group's total bump pass success score was significantly higher — related
• Volleyball knowledge scores improved significantly in the mind map group while the conventional-method control group showed no significant pretest-posttest difference — related