Claims

Both teaching methods improved bump pass scores, but the mind map group's total bump pass success score was significantly higher

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group's mean total bump pass success score was significantly higher than the control group's (t(64)=4.127, p<.001). → Temiz 2023

Evidence

Temiz 2023

Temiz, C. N., & Sivrikaya, A. H. (2023). Mind map technique in physical education: Development of cognitive and psychomotor skills. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi [Journal of Theoretical Educational Science], 16(1), 20-40. http://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1175006

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-samples t-test comparing total bump pass success scores between the experimental group (n=33, mean 8.21, SD 4.83) and control group (n=33, mean 3.61, SD 4.20), reported in Table 8. No standardized effect size is printed for this comparison.

"As seen in Table 8, the mean total bump pass success score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (t(64)=4.127; p<.001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.