Claims

Mobile and e-learning approaches showed better patient positioning and transducer handling than traditional teaching, particularly among physiotherapy students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The most evident advantage of telemedicine teaching reported in the review was better positioning of the patient and handling of the transducer. → Duarte ML 2022

Evidence

Duarte ML 2022

Duarte ML, dos Santos LR, Iared W, Peccin MS. (2022). Comparison of ultrasonography learning between distance teaching and traditional methodology. An educational systematic review. São Paulo Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2021.1047.R.19052022

q3 · i? · review · r3

Review synthesis attributing this advantage to studies using m-learning (Lozano-Lozano et al., Fernández-Lao et al.) with physiotherapy students; the m-learning groups showed better patient positioning, transducer management and image adjustment than traditional-method groups, though examinations took more time.

"The most evident advantage of telemedicine teaching was the better positioning of the patient and handling of the transducer."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.