Claims

Telemedicine-based teaching of ultrasonography produces results similar to traditional methods in most comparative studies, except for venous access procedures where studies disagree

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across 16 included comparative studies, telemedicine teaching of ultrasonography showed results similar to traditional teaching in nine studies, was superior in five, and slightly inferior in two. → Duarte ML 2022

Evidence

Duarte ML 2022

Duarte ML, dos Santos LR, Iared W, Peccin MS. (2022). Comparison of ultrasonography learning between distance teaching and traditional methodology. An educational systematic review. São Paulo Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2021.1047.R.19052022

q3 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review synthesis of 16 comparative studies (randomized trials, one pseudorandomized trial, one prospective cohort) assessed with the Kirkpatrick model and Buckley's quality indicators. The review concludes telemedicine teaching methods are "similar to the traditional method" except for venous access procedures.

"From gathering this data together, we can infer that ultra-sound telemedicine teaching methods are similar to the traditional method, except in the case of teaching venous access procedures, for which the studies did not show agreement."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.