Mobile devices were dominantly used as instructional devices (74.3%), with device function significantly associated with target skill type¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Device function was significantly associated with target skill type, χ²(6) = 184.0, p = .000, and the dominant function was instructional device (74.3%). → Jemma Kim & Christina H. Kimm 2017

Evidence¶

Jemma Kim & Christina H. Kimm 2017¶

Jemma Kim & Christina H. Kimm. (2017). Functional Technology for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: Meta-Analysis of Mobile Device-Based Interventions. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 6(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1149575

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Kendall's tau-b association test across the 140 observed cases: communication device (n=17), instructional device (n=104), organizer (n=19). Devices functioned only as communication devices for communication skills and as organizers only for leisure and vocation skills.

"the function type of devices was significantly associated with the type of target skills, 𝒳𝒳2(6) = 184.0, 𝑝𝑝 = .000"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• PND outcomes were not significantly affected by participant characteristics, device types/functions, intervention strategies, or target skill types — related
• Mobile device-based interventions are very effective for individuals with intellectual disabilities, with a mean PND of 91.8 across 140 observed cases — related