PND outcomes were not significantly affected by participant characteristics, device types/functions, intervention strategies, or target skill types¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Nonparametric tests found no significant differences in PND scores across participants' characteristics, device types/functions, intervention types, and target skill types. → Jemma Kim & Christina H. Kimm 2017

Evidence¶

Jemma Kim & Christina H. Kimm 2017¶

Jemma Kim & Christina H. Kimm. (2017). Functional Technology for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: Meta-Analysis of Mobile Device-Based Interventions. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 6(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1149575

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analytic moderator tests using Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis procedures across the 140 observed cases found no significant PND differences for any moderator; the article reports no effect sizes for these null results.

"There were no significant differences in PND scores across participants’ characteristics, device types/functions, intervention types, and target skill types."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Conducting maintenance and generalization phases was significantly associated with higher PND scores than treatment-only cases — related
• Mobile devices were dominantly used as instructional devices (74.3%), with device function significantly associated with target skill type — related
• Mobile device-based interventions are very effective for individuals with intellectual disabilities, with a mean PND of 91.8 across 140 observed cases — related
• Employment of a mastery criterion was positively associated with PND scores (τ = .168, p = .023) — reports the opposite
• Writing intervention effects for US ELL students do not vary significantly by study quality indicators, participant characteristics, or intervention characteristics — related
• No study or participant characteristic (publication type, research design, sample size, grade level, reading difficulties) significantly moderated effects of technology-delivered literacy instruction — related
• Prior meta-analyses found the screen inferiority effect did not differ as a function of digital device type — related
• Effects of educational technology literacy interventions differ according to characteristics of the interventions and participants — related